Montag, 26. September 2011

Dear Clarence...

The McCanns' spokesman Clarence Mitchell had said: "There is constant activity by these ghouls. They have accused Kate and Gerry of child neglect and worse, and covering up Madeleine's death.

"The trouble is that it is very hard to stop these people. They hide away behind their computer screens, blogging away." 

...yes, it is very hard to stop us. But the reason is not that we love to hurt grieving parents in general or have no jobs, friends or family to occupy us. The reason is that you, Clarence, have done a terrible job in the past 4 years and have forced us to make sense of the utter bollocks you have dished out to the world. Of course a job like yours depends on the material you have got to work with and that is indeed more than poor. Still no reason good enough to blame us for the failure of selling the abduction to the thinking masses.

Lets put it in a nutshell where we are standing:

Evidence FOR an abduction:
The witness Jane Tanner sees the abductor while flip-flopping up a narrow street where two men are chatting none of which either sees or hears Jane passing by. She only sees his back, not his face but is pretty sure later on that he is Murat, Cooperman or any other new suspect dragged along. THE END

Evidence AGAINST an abduction:
- Shutters could not be opened from the outside
- No fingerprints on the shutters, window pane or ledge
- Plant material on the window sill was not disturbed
- No DNA evidence at all inside the apartment
- No break-in signs on the front door
- Cadaver odour detected by Britains top cadaver dog in various places two of which got corroborated by an additional CSI dog indicating the same places. Both alerts got corroborated by findings of DNA from "bodily fluid" with markers that contain Madeleine's DNA but allegedly were from more than one person.
- An impossible "window of opportunity" of maximum 3 minutes during which the shutters were allegedly opened without any noise being heard by the two people standing at the side of the apartment, let alone the flip-flopping Tanner.
- The statement of Mr. Smith who was 80% sure that the person he and his family saw carrying a "sleeping" girl towards the coast was Gerry McCann.
- The statement of Mr. Brooks who saw a couple carrying a child in the early morning hours of May 4th at the same time the couple McCann was out and about allegedly doing their very first "search"
- The changes of statements and discrepancies of the couple McCann and their friends too numerous to mention including such marvels as the door through which they left the apartment or the completely wrong description of apartment 5A given by Matt Oldfield indicating he was never inside.
- The unexplainable complete trust in the group of friends that never waivered once although some of them were merely acquaintances.
- Outright lies in the rogatories like the checks by Russell O'Brien INSIDE the apartments 5A and 5B on the Sunday while 5B was allegedly occupied by Matt Oldfield due to "sickness"
- Another outright lie regarding the positioning of a cot in the parent's bedroom during the week that was repositioned after Wednesday morning
- The refusal to answer the questions of the Portuguese Police by Kate McCann in September
- The grieving process clearly to be seen on the 4th May that got gradually less and less in complete contrast to the reactions of parents in an abduction case that starts off with a lot of hope and gets gradually worse as time passes.
- The evidently planted false sightings like the one in India where the local police were never involved
- The sourcing of private detectives that clearly never had any experience in abduction cases like Metodo3

You see Clarence, it is not us, the ghouls, that are weird in our disbelief of the official theory but those that cling to the one single argument FOR an abduction. The cultists. But their numbers are small although their heads seem many. And the reason for their minority lies in your poor work. Reduced to abuse against those that just won't accept your stories and the need to plant yet another of the now ridiculous numbers of sighting I do pity you sometimes. One argument is just not enough.

Flip flop, flip flop.....


  1. Your articles just get better - so glad you took the time to do this, it's a triumph.

  2. Clarence is the man who told us NOT ONE of the Tapas 9 had watch OR mobile phone with them on the evening in question. He never withdrew that statement, although he later issued another statement claiming none of them had a mobile phone with them (equally incredible in my view, given their professional status).

  3. Brilliant summary!
    The McCann case is the lousiest parody and wind-up of the century and a defenceless little child is the victim.


  5. We might add - although obviously as an ACADEMICAL possibility, it has to be considered - that statistics, geography, sociology, criminology and good old common sense and oldfashioned reasoning tell us that the abduction of an almost four-year-old English girl from inside an apartment in Praia da Luz, where two younger children were also sleeping, during a one-week holiday, simply does not happen. Never happened before, never happened afterwards, not in the Algarve, not in the entire country of Portugal, never in our history. Not even a vaguely similar situation. And no matter what Mrs McCann invents for her book. There is nothing.

  6. Dies ist mit der ekelhafteste pinkfarbene Dreck, den ich je gesehen habe:

    Wie kommt ein eigentlich doch seriöser Regionalsender wie der MDR dazu, so einen Mist auszustrahlen? Ohne jedes Hinterfragen, vollkkommen unreflektiert.
    Und mit welcher Frechheit die portugiesische Polizei in den Dreck gezogen wird!

  7. Hallo Johanna,

    du hast gut geschrieben!!! Mach weiter so, bleib aber besser auf der Hut.

    LG Sibylle