A Message from Gonçalo Amaral (transl.)

Liebe Freunde,

Die Zivilklage, die gegen mich vom Ehepaar McCann angestrengt wurde, befindet sich im letzten Stadium und die Entscheidung bzgl. der wesentlichen Tatsachen, die mir recht vorteilhaft erscheint, ist bereits bekannt. Es folgt eine Periode juristischer Einlassungen, nach der wir das Urteil erwarten, das meiner Erwartung nach in einem erhofften Freispruch münden wird und der Aufhebung der Auflagen, die mir solch umfassende finanzielle Schwierigkeiten in den letzten fünf Jahren verursachten. Das bedeutet, dass es nur eurer Hilfe zu verdanken ist, dass ich den laufenden Prozess finanziell fortsetzen konnte, was allerdings nicht mein immer erdrückender werdendes Privatleben betrifft.

Ich sage erdrückend weil ich im Privatleben eine sehr ernste Krise emotionaler und auch finanzieller Art erlebe. Dies ist denen geschuldet, die mich versuchten finanziell zu ersticken, meinen Bürgerlichen Tod wünschen und mich in einer Situation sehen wollen, in der ich mich juristisch nicht wehren kann. Nach fünf Jahren (gezählt seit die Zivilklage angestrebt wurde), ist es den Eltern des Kindes, das am 3. Mai 2007 auf mysteriöse Weise verschwand, nicht gelungen, ihr Vorhaben umzusetzen. Ich bin am Leben, ich bin in der finanziellen Lage die Zivilklage fortzusetzen, allerdings nicht viel mehr...

Was die emotionale Krise angeht, bitte ich euch zu verstehen, dass für mich dieser ganze Kampf nicht nur um die grundlegende Entdeckung der Wahrheit geht, denn ganz egal wie optimistisch ich sein mag, ich kann nie die Schadensklage über 1.200.000 Euro vergessen, die vom Ehepaar erhoben wurde, und die, wenn ihr absurderweise stattgegeben würde, mich völlig zerstören würde auf allen Ebenen.

Euch allen, vielen Dank.

Goncalo Amaral
Lissabon, 2. Februar 2015




Dear Friends,
The civil suit that was filed against me by the McCann couple is in its final stages, and the decision concerning material facts, which to me seems rather favourable, is already known. A period for legal allegations ensues, after which we will await the verdict, which I envision will translate into my longed for acquittal and the consequent lifting of the attachments that have caused me such extensive financial difficulties over the past five years. This means that it has been only due to your help that I have been able to financially sustain the ongoing lawsuit, which nonetheless cannot be said about my increasingly strangled personal life.

I say strangled because in reality I am experiencing a very serious crisis on an emotional as well as a financial level. This is due to those who have tried to asphyxiate me financially, wishing for my civil death and wanting to place me in a position where I would be unable to react judicially. After five years (counted since the civil suit was filed) the parents of the child that mysteriously disappeared on the 3rd of May of 2007 in the Algarve were not able to fully achieve what they intended. I am alive, I'm able to financially sustain the civil suit, although not much more than that...

Concerning my emotional crisis, I ask you to understand that for me, this whole struggle is not only about the fundamental discovery of the truth, because no matter how optimistic I may be, I can never forget the demand for damages amounting to 1.200.000 Euro that was filed by the couple, which, if absurdly it would be granted, will completely destroy me on all levels.
To all of you, thank you very much.

Gonçalo Amaral
Lisboa, February 2, 2015

Interview with the Ex-Coordinator

translated by Astro from TheMaddieCaseFiles.com

Gonçalo Amaral’s interview on Agora Nós, RTP1, 23.01.2015

Anchor – Today, our guest is Gonçalo Amaral who was on the news again yesterday because of the lawsuit that the McCann couple filed against him. Good morning, Gonçalo.

Gonçalo Amaral – Good morning.

Anchor – I read in your book that you wrote this book to defend your honour. The first question that I have for you is: Were you in any way attacked by the McCanns before the publication of the book, or even during the investigation? Were you with them, did you question them?

Gonçalo Amaral – That is a very good question. There was indeed a series of attacks, not just directed at me but at the investigation. Those attacks came not only from the parents’ side, but also from their support staff and from journalists, English and even Portuguese. That honour was not only personal but also professional. The investigation was at stake, an investigation that was never defended here in Portugal, namely by someone at the top of the Polícia Judiciária – and it’s me who defends those initial months of the investigation, and that is what the book was published for. That is one of the issues that are raised by the Lisbon Appeals Court, at the time of the injunction, which supports me, and establishes that it was licit for me to write the book.

Anchor – If you don’t mind, let’s return to the start of this story, the McCann case was the most media exposed ever, as far as the alleged abduction of a child, Madeleine McCann, is concerned. This book, “Maddie, A Verdade da Mentira”, that was written by you, why was it so controversial? What does it contain?

Gonçalo Amaral – What it contains is the conclusions of the process, of a report that exists, in September of 2007, which says that at that moment of the investigation, suspicion falls upon the [McCann] couple in terms of an accidental death inside the apartment, neglect in watching over their children that had been abandoned, and the concealment of a corpse. That is in the process and with this decision, which is not a final decision, it is merely a reply to the facts that were at stake during the trial, it agrees that this was in the process.

Anchor – The process is not concluded yet, it is still ongoing –

Gonçalo Amaral – It is still in the lower court, now there will be legal arguments, then there will be a verdict –

Anchor – We are at the stage of replies to the proved facts, is that it?

Gonçalo Amaral – Proved and not proved.

Anchor – Did you question them? Did you meet them?

Gonçalo Amaral – I met them but the questioning was performed by others, by inspectors. A coordinator does not question directly, that was done by the inspectors. But I met them.

Anchor – You accompanied this process from the beginning…

Gonçalo Amaral – I accompanied the process, the investigation from the 3rd of May of 2007 until I left the investigation on the 2nd of October of 2007. I accompanied it, participating in the investigation.

Anchor – And what happened yesterday? What was the accusation –

Gonçalo Amaral – There was no accusation yesterday. Not yesterday, the day before yesterday. What was done is – there is a decision from the magistrate, the judge, saying what is proved and what is not proved. That decision says that it is not proved that I caused the couple any damages, social or psychological or moral damages. So what was being questioned, it’s not the book that causes such damages; they were already destroyed before the book. That is important. It’s important because in this kind of process, what is at stake, contrary to what the couple said, that what was at stake was the investigation, whether they are guilty or not, none of that was being discussed there. What was at stake there was whether or not that book and that documentary could be made, if they were licit or not, if they caused the couple any damages, and whether or not it was possible to establish a causal nexus between the book and the damages. And the indications that are given lead me, and my lawyer, and people who have already read the document, to believe that there may be – there may be – a favourable verdict.

Anchor – There is a contradiction between the news that came out –

Gonçalo Amaral – There is no contradiction. There is complete manipulation of the media.

Anchor – Can you clarify that?

Gonçalo Amaral - Lusa agency, since all of this began, has been taking sides – I wouldn’t say as much as they have taken the side of the couple, but they have taken the side of the couple’s lawyer. So there have been completely false news about me. I remember an article that was published in 2009 or 2010, which mentioned I was going to be tried over torture in a certain case, that I had been accused of torture. I was in Spain at that time and I called, it was already 7 or 8 p.m. and I said “Excuse me, but this is not true. I am being accused of omitting a denunciation and making a false statement, not of torture”. And the reply that I got from the Lusa journalist was that it’s them that make the news, that it was not for me to meddle with their work and that is how it’s been –

Anchor – Even though they were talking about your life.

Gonçalo Amaral – That’s another thing that happened throughout all of these years, not only the five years of this process, but since 2007 they have been rummaging… I don’t know what else there may be.

Anchor – The fact is that concerning the McCann couple, the McCann couple was never formally tried. They were never accused. So in your book we have a contradiction with the law.

Gonçalo Amaral – What is the contradiction? I don’t accuse them. I am nobody, I’m not a magistrate, I’m not the case magistrate to write up an accusation –

Anchor – But you had knowledge, you were part of the investigation –

Gonçalo Amaral – I was a technician, I’m a technician, and like anyone else, I have the right to an opinion. And as a technician, based not only on my professionalism, but also on my knowledge as a technician, I have the right to have a technical opinion. And that book contains a technical opinion, based on facts that are in the process and that the judge says are in the process. Essentially, as is said, they are in the process. Therefore, saying that they were not accused… The process was – when I left there was already a movement to have the case archived. From the moment that they are made arguidos, everything moves to shelve the case. Interest was lost; the interest was to archive the case. And they succeeded in shelving the case. It was in the couple’s interest to have the case archived, and two things happen: The couple does nothing, and they could have done something when there was a shelving, to continue into the instruction [phase] to keep the process going, for the truth to be found. You see, the conclusions that we reached were the conclusions of an investigation. And an investigation, like someone said, is always a zigzagging of the moment. And we might even have reached the end of the investigation –

Anchor – In this case, this investigation was very traumatising, very disorganised…

Gonçalo Amaral – Disorganised, in what way?

Anchor - Because nothing was concluded, so many years later the child’s whereabouts haven’t been found.

Gonçalo Amaral – Because of interferences that took place, without interferences we would have gone further. Have no doubts about that. That is why the process was archived. When the shelving took place, the couple and another person were arguidos. Any one of them could have requested the opening of the instruction and continued the process. None of them did it, the couple because they didn’t want to, they didn’t want to do it, and the other person because he received compensation from the British courts, so he didn’t do it, he was very satisfied, and now it seems that he is an arguido again. This is what happens –

Anchor - We have to ask one last question. The truth is that the McCann couple – and this is a question and not a statement – demanded compensation worth 1.2 million euro from you because of the publication of the book “A Verdade da Mentira”. This book was very controversial because it was also a success. Many people read it –

Anchor – Many copies were sold.

Anchor – Exactly. Many people read it and created their own opinion. Do you think that in some way that opinion drew people away from the possibility of believing in that child’s parents?

Gonçalo Amaral – No, it didn’t, quite the opposite. The book, which was successful in a way that nobody expected – the contract with the editor was even made based on sales targets, 10 thousand books sold would mean a certain percentage and so on – therefore a very normal contract, nobody was thinking about bestsellers or anything like that. What the book brought was more publicity for the case. And people were not drawn away. There are many people who still defend the couple’s thesis. There are other people – those diverging opinions already existed before the book. They already existed practically before the book. What motivates the couple to file the lawsuit of 1.2 million euro may be the money. They have a firm, a firm where they are members of the board, called Madeleine Fund, which is to look for their daughter, but they are members of the board, it’s a firm, it’s not a social association, or social solidarity, it’s a firm, it’s registered in England as a firm. And what they always wanted was to destabilise me. When they went to Oprah’s programme in the United States, they said it, they wrote on their website that they hope that now nobody believes in that person anymore, for this and that –

Anchor – But Gonçalo, they had to defend themselves with the weapons at hand, if they think they are innocent…

Gonçalo Amaral – Indeed they do. I will give you one example. We speak about the book and we speak about the documentary. We forget another detail. In 2009, in January of 2009, I lived in the Algarve and was indicated to run for mayor of Olhão on behalf of the Social Democratic Party [PSD]. And that alerted that family, that situation of destabilising me, and Mr Gerald McCann came to Lisbon, there’s news from that time, he met with a top political official from PSD who has a French surname, with Dr Rogério Alves and with Dr Isabel Duarte – this is what is said, it’s what was published – and what happened then was that PSD gave me up as a candidate. This puts rights at stake, the rights of a citizen, the rights of a Portuguese citizen, and someone comes from the outside to do it. It’s the right to be elected. And this is when they start thinking about the lawsuit. It’s not about what is in the book, what is in the documentary, because what the book and the documentary contain is what is in the process. They contain technical opinions. And it’s the fear of that issue – when they come over here and put the right to be elected at stake, with the acquiescence of people inside PSD, that this happened.

Anchor – Thank you very much, Gonçalo. Our time is short but this is a subject that we would like to discuss in more depth. We will continue to follow this because the process is still in its early stages.

Gonçalo Amaral – There is no motive to get too excited, but it’s a good indication of what may be the decision.

Anchor – Thank you for joining us today.



video: http://www.rtp.pt/play/p1629/e180119/agora-nos/405316 - interview starts at 22:43

Open to interpretation

Thanks to Astro fromTheMaddieCaseFiles.com we can judge for ourselves the possible outcome of the McCann vs. Amaral Damages Trial and don't have to resort to media spin instigated by the parents' team of media manipulators. BTW not ONE journalist was present... 1. Gonçalo Amaral made the statements that are attributed to him under item Z)*? *(item Z is the Correio da Manhã interview) Proved. 2. The cover price of the book “Maddie, A Verdade da Mentira” in Portugal is € 13.80, including VAT? It is proved that the editor set the selling price at 13,33 euro, including VAT. 3. Defendant Gonçalo Amaral has earned from the sale of the book “Maddie, A Verdade da Mentira” an amount that is not less than € 621.000,00? 4. Defendant Gonçalo Amaral has earned from the sale of editions in foreign languages of the book an amount that is not less than € 498.750,00? (Items 3&4) It is proved that Gonçalo Amaral earned 342.111,86 euro from the sales of the book in the years 2008 and 2009. This information is based on data from the Portuguese Revenue Agency. 5. The book was sold in Brazil by defendant “Guerra e Paz, Editores, S.A.”? Not proved. 6. The DVD has a cover price of € 6,00? Proved that it was sold for 6,95 euro with newspaper Correio daManhã. 7. Defendant Gonçalo Amaral has earned from the sale of the DVD an amount that is not less than € 112.500,00? Proved that he earned 40.000 euro from DVD sales in 2008. Based on info from the Revenue Service. 8. The DVD that is mentioned under AN) has been edited and the edited copies have been sold by defendant “V.C. – Valentim de Carvalho – Filmes, Audiovisuais, S.A.”? Proved. 9. Defendant “V.C. – Valentim de Carvalho – Filmes, Audiovisuais, S.A.”? has already made the DVD, in an English version, available for immediate delivery via internet order? Not proved. 10. At least two million and two hundred thousand people have watched the programme that was broadcast on 13.4.2009? Proved.

	11. Because of the statements made by defendant Gonçalo Amaral in the book, in the documentary and in the interview to Correio da Manhã, the Polícia Judiciária stopped collecting information and investigating the disappearance of Madeleine MacCann? Not proved. 12. Because of the statements made by defendant Gonçalo Amaral in the book, in the documentary and in the interview to Correio da Manhã, authors Kate MacCann and Gerald MacCann are completely destroyed, from a moral, social, ethical, sentimental, family point of view, much beyond the pain that their daughter’s absence causes them? Not proved. 13. Because of the statements made by defendant Gonçalo Amaral in the book, in the documentary and in the interview to Correio da Manhã, authors Kate MacCann and Gerald MacCann suffer permanent anguish, insomnia, lack of appetite, anxiety and irritability, preoccupation and indefinable fear? Proved. The judge adds that this psychological state is pre-existent to the book, the documentary and the interview and was not caused by the book. Nonetheless, it cannot be reasonable to believe that the book, the documentary and the interview had no effect on the couple, i.e. It had an effect but that is perfectly normal. 14. Authors Kate MacCann and Gerald MacCann feel a deep shame and an indescribable ill-being because they are considered, by most people who know the theories of defendant Gonçalo Amaral, as having responsibility in the death of their daughter, being so cowardly that they have hidden her cadaver, simulating abduction, all of this to avoid criminal accusations? Proved that the couple felt badly about being considered responsible over the hiding of their daughter's body and simulating her abduction by those who believe in Mr Amaral's thesis. The judge states that it is not possible to determine what most people who have read or seen Mr Amaral's thesis actually think. She adds that the plaintiffs failed to prove shame, even with Kate stating it was not shame that she felt. The judge once more believes it is expectable that the plaintiffs would feel badly about being considered to be responsible for hiding the body and staging an abduction - not, the judge stresses, about being responsible for their daughter's death, as is commonly, and mistakenly, believed. 15. Authors Kate MacCann and Gerald MacCann live under enormous daily pressure due to the need to keep their younger children away from the knowledge of defendant Gonçalo Amaral’s opinions about their moral integrity? Proved that the couple feels the need to keep their younger children from finding out about said thesis. This fact also derives from common experience and was corroborated by David Trickey's testimony. 16. Namely because of defendant Gonçalo Amaral’s statements in the book, in the documentary and in the interview to Correio da Manhã, author Kate MacCann is immerged in a deep and serious depression, which has already made her state publicly “I wish I was in a coma, to relieve the pain”? Not proved. 17. Sean and Amelie MacCann will soon become aware of the conclusions that are mentioned in J), because they will go to school? It is proved that Sean and Amelie started school in August of 2010 and have not learned about Mr Amaral's thesis yet. 18. 63.369 copies of the DVD were not sold, having been destroyed afterwards? Proved. 19. Defendant Gonçalo Amaral has gone into retirement from the Polícia Judiciária on 1.6.2008? Proved that he retired on July 1st, 2008. 20. On 22.6.2008, the Attorney General’s Office published a note for the media, announcing the archiving of the inquiry, awaiting better evidence? It is proved that such a note was issued on the 21st of July of 2008, the note also informed that the case could be reopened if new evidence appeared and prompted relevant diligences.

	21. The criminal inquiry was reopened due to the appearance of new evidence? Not proved. 22. The attention of the media and of people in general diminished when defendant Gonçalo Amaral’s book was published? Not proved. 23. The sale of the books was made on consignment, being subject to devolution for various reasons, like handling, manufacturing defects or their non-transaction? Proved that the book was partly sold on consignment, and partly firmly sold with a right to return for various motives. 24. The so-called “Maddie Case” has been profoundly treated within the Portuguese and foreign society, whether by the media, or through books, like those authored by Paulo Pereira Cristóvão, Manuel Catarino and Hernâni Carvalho? Proved. 25. The so-called “Maddie Case” was commented upon by Dr. Francisco Moita Flores, former inspector, writer, criminalist and commentator, in various media? Proved. 26. Have authors Kate MacCann and Gerald MacCann hired communication firms and spokespeople through the Madeleine Fund? (for unknown reasons, the judge does not mention this item at all) 27. Are the facts that are reported by defendant Gonçalo Amaral in the book and in the aforementioned interviews, like he himself writes and said, facts that were established during the inquiry? 28. Does the documentary only contain facts that are also in the inquiry files? (Both articles) It is proved that the facts in the book and in the documentary, concerning the investigation, are mostly facts that took place in the investigation and are documented as such. The judge does note that some of the facts in the book are not complete, and some facts that are in the book are not in the case files, including Jane Tanner's "informal" recognition of Robert Murat. 29. The social capital of defendant “V.C. – Valentim de Carvalho – Filmes, Audiovisuais, S.A.” is held, in 60%, by the firm “Estúdios Valentim de Carvalho, Gravações e Audiovisuais, S.A.” and, in 40%, by the Fundo de Investimento para o Cinema e o Audiovisual? Proved. 30. Has defendant “V.C. – Valentim de Carvalho – Filmes, Audiovisuais, S.A.” ceded the rights to sell, distribute, exhibit and broadcast all of the cinematographic and audiovisual work that it creates, develops and produces to the firm “Valentim de Carvalho Multimédia, S.A.”? Proved that VC Filmes agreed to give VC Multimedia the rights to sell and distribute several works that were to be produced within 5 years.

31. Until today, has the documentary been reproduced only once to be edited, published and sold in Portugal under video format, in this case a DVD? Proved. 32. The reproduction and edition of the documentary in video format have been authorised by “Valentim de Carvalho Multimédia, S.A.” to firm “Presslivre, Imprensa Livre, S.A.”, the owner of the Correio da Manhã newspaper, according to a contract between both? Proved. 33. Under which [contract], the DVD, its covers and packages would be, as they were, manufactured on behalf of, under order of and under the responsibility of Presslivre, in order to be distributed and sold together with newspaper Correio da Manhã? Proved. 34. And the entire process of registering and classifying the video edition (DVD) of the documentary with ICAG would be, as it was, developed by Valentim de Carvalho Multimédia, a process whose cost would be carried by Presslivre, as it did? Proved. 35. The distribution for sale took place in conjunction with the distribution for sale of the newspaper Correio da Manhã’s edition of April 24, 2009? It is proved only that the documentary was distributed for sale with the newspaper. 36. The documentary was reproduced, and even subtitled in the English language, by third parties that published it on the internet, without permission and against the will of the defendant “V.C. – Valentim de Carvalho – Filmes, Audiovisuais, S.A.”? Proved. 37. That illicit diffusion damages not only the rights that are held by defendant “V.C. – Valentim de Carvalho – Filmes, Audiovisuais, S.A.” over the documentary, but also its commercial exploration, because any citizen can watch the documentary, also only one “click” away? Proved.

They called him Brunty

The term of endearment implied him having a heart, a conscience and a sense of justice.

Today, on the streets of Paris, pretending to be there as a marcher for the cause instead of fulfilling his duty, he apparently got swept away by the atmosphere of for once belonging to a grand nation and dared to falsely quote Voltaire:

#paristerror The route of the march. Voltaire: "I may disagree w what u say but I defend your right to say it." pic.twitter.com/XbeMHyYx51
— Martin Brunt (@skymartinbrunt) January 11, 2015

Now the full quote by Voltaire's biographer would have been: ""I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

I guess he did not particularly want to mention death in any shape or form.

What is it that renders a quite successful journalist so utterly incapable of self-reflection? Why does he happily jump on the bandwagon to proclaim his defense for freedom of speech in the media while at the same time he has been part of the most outrageous campaign to shut down discussion on another subject on twitter?

While his rather shoddy reporting e.g. on the "full DNA match" in the McCann case has been one of the cornerstones of the scepticism that evolved over the years towards the tale of abduction, he nevertheless allowed himself to be used in the campaign to "hunt the trolls", to shut down dissent on social media by singling out and making an example of a 63 year old mother which ultimately led to her death.

Brenda Leyland was voicing an opinion, no matter if one liked the content or the language in which she did so. It was her right to do so since what she wrote was neither racist nor threatening. She simply refused to believe in the concept of "abduction" much the same as some we are mourning today might not have believed in the concept of "God". After all there is no evidence for either.

But while BRUNTY is shedding crocodile tears in Paris and resorting to the philosophers, the family of Brenda Leyland are still waiting for an apology for his doorstepping and hounding of their mother that led to her death.

So I can only draw the conclusion that he is not ultimately sincere in his demand for free speech but secretly adds: ...for proper media only... That media that is usually the origin of enciting hatred and dividing nations, or the wilful executors.

Nobody seems to call him Brunty these days...

The timeline again

While the investigation is preparing for the final stages and the letters of rogatory are being sent, approved and scheduled for the next step aka the FORENSICS, let me come back to one of my favourite subjects, the timeline.

Going by the dictum that first accounts are the most important ones, I checked the timelines from the sticker book again. Given the state of the handwriting and the crossing out of some words we can assume that this is the sequence in which they were written:

Timeline 1

8:45. pm
Matt returns 9.00-9.05 - listened at all 3
                               - all shutters down
Jerry 9.10-9.15 in the (tv) room + all well
                      ? did he check
9.20/5 - Ella Jane checked 5D sees stranger + child
9.30 - Russ + Ella Matt check all 3
9.35 - Matt check xyz see twins
        - I
9.50 - Russ returns
9.55 - Kate realised Madeleine s
10pm - Alarm raised

First thing I noticed was the part in brackets that could be read as "tv" rather than "the". We did have some statements from the group where it was hinted that Gerry could have gone to watch some football that was on that night on television. For me it points towards an earlier plan where Gerry was away from the table for a longer period, let's say half an hour, and this was going to be the explanation for his absence. The question "? did he check" seems to confirm this. A physical check would not necessarily have been contemplated in an original plan that saw the abduction happening after 9:30. The jemmied shutters had always been the timestamp of the abduction.

Ella suggests that Russell was looking for a reason Jane was added to the original list of "checkers" of the children again indicating an original plan that had to be changed.

But the most important point is the entry "Matt check all 3". If Russell meant, when he wrote this first script, that Matt  had been inside the apartment to physically check on the three children, he would have worded it differently since Madeleine had been gone at that time. No, in my opinion he again cited the original plan where Matt would have listened at all 3 windows again. He did not mean "children", he meant "windows" as in the first entry. It was a left-over of the original plan.

Russell now realised that checking the windows at that stage - as originally agreed upon - would not work since the abduction had already taken place - moved forward due to the Smith sighting -  and got so confused and insecure that he left the crucial check by Matt out of the next, revised version.

Timeline 2

8.45pm. all assembled at poolside for food
9.00pm. Matt Oldfield listens at all 3 windows 5A, B, D
              ALL shutters down
9:15pm Gerry McCann looks at room. A ? Door open to bedroom
9:20pm Jane Tanner checks 5D - [sees stranger walking carrying a child]
9.30 Russell O'Brien in 5D. Poorly daughter
.
.
.
.
9.55pm
10:00pm. Alarm raised after Kate

Gerald

Here the emphasis in on the Tanner sighting and the dots that cover Matt's visit in 5A are left out because he realised that a listening check would have been impossible. The now open window prevented it and he was not sure how to get it right.

If there had been an accident that had been discovered during dinner with an ensuing panic reaction to dispose of her body we would have been presented with one timeline that would have been pretty straightforward because it would have been concocted without any previous concepts in mind which alterations had to be communicated to all members involved.

All this supports my theory that there had been an original plan and timeline present which would have looked something like this:

Timeline 08:45 all assembled at Tapas

9:00 Matt checks at all 3 windows. Shutters down

9:15 Gerry checks at all 3 windows. Shutters down ... enters the apartment to watch some fooball results

9:30 Russell checks at all 3 windows. Shutters down

. Gerry returns

9:45 Kate checks at all 3 windows. Shutters jemmied.

Crowd perception

One comment from me regarding yesterdays court case:

The will to accept conspiracies in everything relating to this case is apparently not reserved for those that still read their tea leaves to decide on whether to hang their washing out, but seems to have affected studied lawyers as well.

Apparently all defense lawyers unanimously suggested that Scotland Yard - who take years and millions to finally decide on re-testing evidence from behind the sofa and the hired car - would be so organised and cunning to be able to orchestrate their visits to correlate with the hearings in the damages case. While both processes are subject to a heap of unforseeable events, like the break-down in the portuguese justice system or the dismissal of lawyers on the day of the hearing...

And almost everybody seems to nod their heads in consent and cleverly remarks that this is what they have said and known all along...

Now here is a list of the court dates and the number of correlating visits by Scotland Yard in Portugal:

12th September 2013 - nada
13th September 2013 - nada
19th September 2013 - nada
20th September 2013 - nada
27th September 2013 - nada
2nd October 2013 - nada
8th October 2013 - nada (Crimewatch had been announced on the 4th October, mobile phone records are new clues)
5th November 2013 - nada (Monteiro is in the news)
19th November 2013 - nada
27th November 2013 - nada (news about hope of a Joint Investigation Team)
16th June 2014 - nada (searches had ended on 11th June)
8th July 2014 - nada (questioning had ended on 2nd July)
10th December 2014 - BINGO


WOW

ONCE they were in Portugal at the time of a court hearing. This either shows extremely bad planning skills on the part of Scotland Yard or rather what can happen to crowd perception when enough numpties repeat after each other...

Schadenersatzklage McCanns gegen Amaral 10.12.2014

Eine Zusammenfassung des heutigen Gerichtstages nach dem Bericht von astro - maddiecasefiles.com (english version in Link)

Die Verhandlung fand heute in einem anderen Raum statt. An der Wand über der Richterin - die übrigens nicht ersetzt wurde - standen die Worte geschrieben "A injustiça feita a um é ameaça para todos" - Ein Unrecht, das einer Person angetan wird, ist eine Bedrohung für jedermann.

Ein Umstand, der noch nicht so bekannt war, wurde heute deutlich: Isabel Duarte ist die Anwältin der Eltern während Ricardo Afonso der Anwalt ist, der die drei Kinder der McCanns vertritt. Jedem dieser Anwälte standen heute 90 Minuten zur Verfügung für eine Art Schlußplädoyer. Isabel Duarte nahm allerdings nicht an der Verhandlung teil (evtl. wird der Grund noch bekannt) und so mussten "nur" 1,5 Stunden überstanden werden, während denen Ricardo Afonso in "Fidel Castro Manier" seine Rede hielt. Trotzdem blieb es wohl bei einem geschätzten Drittel seiner Anschuldigungen, da ihn die Richterin dann unterbrach.

Trotzdem referierte er fast 2 Stunden über Zahlen, verglich das Buch mit ausgewählten Teilen der Polizeiakten und versuchte Goncalo Amaral, die PJ und die Hunde zu diskreditieren, während er gleichzeitig darauf beharrte, dass die britische Polizei nicht einer Meinung mit den Schlüssen der PJ waren, die dazu führten, die McCanns zu Arguidos zu machen.

Ein Beispiel seiner Argumentation: das Buch beginnt mit der Erwähnung von Jägern, die Hasen jagen, was angeblich nicht zur Jahreszeit/Jagdzeit passen würde. Daher wäre auch alles andere im Buch falsch.

Er versuchte die Hunde anzufechten, die DNA Tests, Mark Harrisons Bericht, von dem er sagte, er wäre nur auf die Möglichkeit ihres Todes ausgerichtet gewesen. Er behauptete, die PJ wären auf Teufel komm raus darauf aus gewesen die McCanns zu beschuldigen und die Beweise den Anschuldigungen anzupassen.

Um es kurz zu machen, er erörterte Dinge, die keinen Platz in diesem Prozess hatten; weite Teile seiner Behauptungen waren darauf ausgerichtet, die polizeiliche Untersuchung und den Arguido status der McCanns zu erläutern, mit einigen Erwähnungen von Alipio Ribeiro und seiner Aussage, es wäre "voreilig" gewesen, die Eltern zu Arguidos zu erklären.

Er attackierte auch die Glaubwürdigkeit der Familie Smith und hinterfragte, warum sie als glaubwürdige Zeugen der Untersuchung gesehen wurden während Jane Tanner diskreditiert wurde. Er sagte, dass die Tanner Sichtung die Smith Sichtung untermauere aber dass der Koordinator - Amaral - und sein Team einfach nichts anderes untersuchen wollten als die Todeshypothese und die Eltern.


Der Angeklagte wollte nur "Blood, Swet and Tears" verkaufen.

Er fügte hinzu dass die Untersuchung jegliche Objectivität verlor und dass die britische Polizei, Martin Grime und Mark Harrison dies erkannten und befürchteten, dass die McCanns Opfer einer impulsiven und ungerechtfertigten "Arguidisierung" wurden. (ja dann hätte Kate ohne Anwalt die 48 Fragen beantworten müssen - Anmerkung von mir)

Er führte weiterhin aus, dass Stuart Prior "sehr beunruhigt" war als er sich mit der PJ am 4. September traf, nur Tage bevor die McCanns zu Arguidos erklärt wurden. Und dass er deshalb beunruhigt war, weil er wusste dass es falsch war sie zu beschuldigen, da es keine Beweise gab und die DNA Berichte falsch interpretiert wurden, aus Bequemlichkeit/zum Nutzen der PJ.

Dann etwa wurde er von der Richterin unterbrochen. Er verbrachte keine ZWEI MINUTEN damit, die Aussagen seiner Zeugen zu erwähnen. Aus gutem Grund wie wir uns vorstellen können.

Gonçalo Amarals Anwalt, Miguel Cruz Rodrigues, betonte, dass diese Klage vor Gericht nur dem Zweck diene das Ehepaar von Schuld freizusprechen. Schuld die Kinder in der Nacht des Verschwindens nicht beaufsichtigt zu haben, und Schuld nicht mit der polizeilichen Untersuchung kooperiert zu haben.

Der Mangel an Kooperation der Eltern und ihrer Freunde führte dazu, den Fall zu den Akten zu legen, etwas, dem sie sich nie widersetzt haben obwohl es möglich gewesen wäre.

Er führte auch aus, dass es sehr merkwürdig wäre wenn sie nicht deprimiert, ängstlich und traurig wären. Wenn sie keinen Appetitverlust und Schlafstörungen gehabt hätten. Aber wo ist der kausale Zusammenhang zum Buch? Der wurde nicht bewiesen. Ihre Beschwerden könnte jede ander Ursache haben, z.B. die Schuld, die sie fühlen müssen wegen der Verletzung ihrer Aufsichtspflicht und wegen ihres Verhaltens im Laufe der Untersuchung.

Zusammenfassend: Vage Anschuldigungen von Seiten der Eltern aber keine Beweise für irgendeinen Zusammenhang mit der Veröffentlichung des Buches.

Fatima Esteves, Anwalt für Guerra e Paz, stellte heute die etwas emotionaleren Behauptungen auf. Sie betonte ein paar relevante Punkte:

- das fast vollständige Fehlen von Journalisten im Gerichtssaal heute, im Gegensatz zum vollen Saal immer wenn die Eltern am Prozess teilnehmen, was beweist, dass die McCanns der Motor hinter den Medien sind and sie die Agenda der Medien definieren.

- die Eltern hätten von Anfang an zu Arguidos erklärt werden sollen, was im Fall verschwundener Kinder üblich wäre.

- die Zeugen der Anklage hätten sehr vage Aussagen gemacht und zwei von ihnen hätten sogar nachträglich schriftliche Berichte eingereicht (die von der Richterin abgelehnt, von einer höheren Instanz aber zugelassen wurden) ohne von der Anklage befragt zu werden.

- es wurde nicht bewiesen, dass die angeblichen Schäden durch das Buch resultierten.

- Scotland Yard erscheint, zufällig, immer dann wenn es eine Gerichtssitzung in Lissabon gibt.

- die McCanns verklagen Goncalo Amaral um die Zwillinge vor einem Buch zu schützen, dass diese nicht lesen können, da es auf portugiesisch ist, aber verklagen nicht die Websites, die die englische Übersetzung veröffentlichen, die die Zwillinge lesen können.

- die McCanns haben nie die Wiedereröffnung des Falles in Portugal beantragt. 

- Kopien der Bücher des Fund wurden von der Verteidigung angefordert aber von den Eltern abgelehnt.

Miguel Coroadinha, der Anwalt von TVI, begann mit einer Kopie der heutigen Ausgabe des Correio da Manha und einem Artikel über die Befragungen in Faro um die folgenden Punkte deutlich zu machen:

- die Besuche durch Scotland Yard lenken die Aufmerksamkeit vom Prozess ab, wiederholt und genau passend.

- der Fall ist bereits Grundlage zu Studien über seine aussergewöhnliche Medienpräsenz geworden

- die McCanns haben den Fall in den Focus der Medien gebracht und tun alles um ihn dort zu halten

- die Aufmerksamkeit der Medien hat nie nachgelassen und das Buch hatte keinen Einfluss auf die Medien oder die Untersuchung

- Zeugen für die McCanns haben ausgesagt, die Medienpräsenz hätte mit der Veröffentlichung des Buches zugenommen

- TVI hatte die Dokumentation der McCanns nicht gesendet da die McCanns ihr Einverständnis zurückzogen nachdem bereits darüber verhandelt worden war.

- was angebliche Schäden betrifft ist es unmöglich einen kausalen Zusammenhang zum Buch zu beweisen

- dieser Gerichtssaal ist nicht der Platz um Fehler der Untersuchung zu diskutieren (wie Ricardo Afonso), aber wenn es einen Fehler gab, dann war es der, die McCanns nicht am Tag nach dem Verschwinden nicht zu Arguidos gemacht zu haben. Wenn dies geschehen wäre, wären wir vielleicht heute nicht hier.

- die Zeugen der Mccanns waren emotionell zu involviert und zu nahestehend um glaubhaft zu sein.

- die beiden "Experten" Gutachten (ich nehme an die schriftlich, nachgereichten) wurden von den Autoren benutzt um der Befragung zu diesen Berichten auszuweichen

- das Ehepaar versucht Geschichte umzuschreiben, jeden zu überzeugen, dass die einzige Theorie ihre eigene sei, aber das Buch ist bereits Teil der Fallgeschichte.

Das weitere Vorgehen ist wie folgt:

Der nächste Verhandlungstag ist der 21. Januar 2015. Dann wird die Richterin vortragen was als "materia de facto" während der Verhandlungen vom Gericht festgestellt werden konnte. Dies sollte einen ersten Eindruck auf das mögliche Urteil geben.

Danach laufen 30 Tage ab in denen die McCanns ein Dokument des High Court Richters in London vorlegen müssen, das belegt, dass sie berechtigt sind, Madeleine zu repräsentieren, da sie ja ein Mündel des Gerichts ist. Wir werden sehen, wie lange sie diese Zeitspanne ausreizen werden.

Sollten die Eltern das Dokument nicht einreichen, wird nur der Teil der Verhandlung annuliert, der Madeleine betrifft. Alles andere geht weiter.

Dann haben alle Anwälte 10 Tage Zeit ihre "alegações de direito" einzureichen. Ein Urteil wird dann frühestens für März erwartet.

Phase 3

That was quick.

Only two days after my latest post predicting future tests on items from the hired car that had been sent back to Portugal, we have this article in Correio da Manha, that mentions retesting and hired car in one sentence.

Will wait for proper translation. Stay tuned...


-----------

Pulled up from the comments section. Big thank you to Mercedes:

Experts from the National Institute of Legal Medicine (INML) analyzed 444 hairs that were collected by the Judicial Police in the months following the disappearance of Madeleine McCann in 2007, in Praia da Luz, Lagos. As far as CM knows, 25 blood and saliva samples, and three other traces found in the room where the girl disappeared, and in the trunk of a car underwent forensic tests. These are some of the vestiges that Scotland Yard now wants to take to England to be retested in a British private laboratory.

The English, as CM reported yesterday, want to re-analyze the curtains that were in Maddie’s room, which were subject to expert analyses by INML in 2007, and which found nothing relevant. The collection of vestiges was made in homes, cars and sofas by experts of the Forensic Science Laboratory of the PJ. Among these vestiges are also hair samples and saliva of several people who were considered important for the investigation. In the list of 444 hairs subject to examination 432 are human and 12 nonhuman, 98 had no correspondence with any DNA profile and 19 gave partial results. The request for re-evaluation of the vestiges, are part of a 6th rogatory letter. This despite the absence of a decision, by the new public prosecutor in Portimão, Inés Sequeira, about the 5th letter, sent by the British to Portugal.

The final curtain? (update)

The Mirror, which has been the inofficial mouthpiece for a couple of months now, today continues to  desperately spin the fact that Scotland Yard wants to retest for possible DNA evidence from the apartment where the McCanns stayed in 2007.

Madeleine McCann new DNA hope: Curtains may hold key to who took her

Do you notice the reek of desperation evaporating from these two lines? How to spin the basic facts when the latest paedo is as good as eliminated from the investigation? When hairs of burglar-abductors are not the only objective of the Scotland Yard investigation. When CURTAINS are being mentioned...

The Mirror tries to tell the uninformed masses - and some that should be informed - that the curtains from the bedroom where Madeleine and her two siblings were sleeping are the focus of the request to retest some of the samples that were returned to Portugal at the end of 2007 and those that were kept there from the beginning. You remember the whooshing curtains?

Unfortunately, these curtains were never collected, sent to Britain, tested or kept in Portugal. Just check the files.

The only curtains that feature prominently in the original police files are those that were hanging behind the furniture-that-must-not-be-named and where the four-legged-creatures-that-must-also-not-be-named did what they are supposed to do with unquestioned precision. Curtains that never got in contact with the burglar-abductor if you believe the abduction tale.

The original Portuguese investigation retained a sample of the lower part of the white net curtains from the living-room (I said it). Guess where Keela the CSI blood dog alerted when she was deployed to 5A for a second time on August 3rd?

On this date a new sniffer dog inspection was carried out in the apartment mentioned above, with the help of the dog Keela who detects human blood remains. The activity produced the following results: 19.19 The dog "marked" an area of tiles in the living room, next to the window and behind the sofa. 19.20 The dog "marked" the lower part of the left white coloured curtain of the window behind the sofa.

It is not quite clear what happened to the original blue curtains that were tested at the FSS in Britain. So far I could not find a return note. But searching for it, I found another return note that could turn out extremely interesting in the next weeks.

It is the delivery note from the FSS to Leicestershire Police of non-perishable samples that were not destroyed but returned. Thirty-three samples.

They could represent the following items (there is no batch number given, so take this with caution):

1. 10 (1) baggage compartment lined with fabric with ventilation holes
2. 10 (2) moulded plastic extension
3. 1A Head hair collected from the driver - s seat.
4. 1B Fibres and possible head hair from the back of the driver - s seat.
5. 1C Fibres and possible head hair from the bottom of the driver - s seat.
6. 1D Nail fragment collected in the floor in front of the driver - s seat
7. 2A Head hair collected to the right of passenger - s seat.
8. 2B Head hair collected from the floor next to the right front passenger - s seat
9. 2C Fibres and possible head hair from the back of the right front passenger's seat
10. 2D Fibres and possible head hair from the bottom of the right front passenger's seat.
11. 2E Nail fragment collected in the floor in front of the driver - s seat.
12. 3 Head hair collected between the front seats.
13. 4A Head hair collected from the left area of the back seat.
14. 4B Fibres and possible head hair from the back in the left area of the back seat.
15. 4C Fibres and possible head hair from the bottom in the left area of the back seat.
16. 5A Head hair collected from the middle area of the back seat.
17. 5B Fibres and possible head hair from the back in the middle area of the back seat.
18. 5C Fibres and possible head hair from the bottom in the middle area of the back seat.
19. 6A Head hair collected from the right area of the back seat.
20. 6B Fibres and possible head hair from the back in the right area of the back seat.
21. 6C Fibres and possible head hair from the bottom in the right area of the back seat.
22. 7A Head hair collected from the left seat of the luggage area.
23. 7B Fibres and possible head hair from the back of the left seat in the vehicle luggage area.
24. 7C Fibres and possible head hair from the bottom in the left area of the back seat.
25. 8A Head hair collected from the right seat of the luggage area.
26. 8B Fibres and possible head hair from the back of the right seat in the vehicle luggage area.
27. 8C Fibres and possible head hair from the bottom of the right seat in the vehicle luggage area.
28. 9 Head hair collected from the vehicle luggage area.
29. 11 Fibres and possible head hair in the rear shelf/luggage cover.
30. 11 Fibres and possible head hair in the rear shelf/luggage cover.
31. 12 Key card
32. 13 Pattern sample of the fabric covering the vehicle seats.
33. 15 Pattern samples taken from the clothes worn by PMFG Vilhena.

All samples from the hired car. It is yet unclear if they were returned to Portugal.

So the Mirror might still focus on the relatively safe area of the bedroom, where the dogs did not alert, while the curtain in question is definitely from the living-room where they did, but what will they do if the focus is turning onto samples from the hired car? Will we then see headlines like this?
 

Kate and Gerry furios:
Burglars stored body in hired car while they were jogging

All in the Family

This was Clarence Mitchell talking to the Press shortly after Martin Brunt had stalked and outed her on live TV, while the DailyMail shortly afterwards gave her real name away splitting the outing to avoid repercussion.

After her horrible and lonely death we find out via a radio interview of the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Bernhard Hogan-Howe that it was the family who gave the Dossier to the Police, either to BHH himself as Martin Brunt claimed, or to Operation Grange, although a complaint to the local police of Leicestershire would have been the logic choice.

Interviewer: So tell me about that file that was handed to you re. at the McCanns, you know, concerned individuals and certainly that story has been in the headlines with tragic consequences...yesterday. A file handed to you? Are you looking at it at the minute?


BHH - no what happened, well first of all, you may have seen over the last 10 days we've launched a cyber crime unit, about 500 officers. Thats really intended to target people who steal things, not necessarily bullying , I think that's going to be a real challange to us in the future just in terms of volume.

But in terms of that file, what happened if you recall was that the family handed to our team who are investigating or reviewing the murder of... sorry errm reviewing the missing girl errm the McCann daughter. The file was handed to that team and we were liasing with Leicestershire police which is where the McCann family live..... and as suddenly it turned out possibly the person who was trolling or abusing people may well have been.

So the file was in the process of being considered partly by the Met, partly by Leicestershire police but it was likely to have been dealt with by Leicestershire police and not by the Met.

The question remains who gave the "dossier" to the media, but if one discounts the leaking of such uninteresting material by the Police then there remains only one possibility...

IMO this concerted campaign to shut up those on the internet that still after 7 years are very vocal in questioning the McCanns and their version of events started with the book by Summers & Swan, which prepared the way with their constant reference to "haters" of the parents combined with the claim of authority on the "definite account" of what happened in Praia da Luz in 2007.

The supporter group had been hording information on the "dissenters" for a long time and after Summers and Swan claimed that trolls and haters had led a campaign to discredit their book on amazon.co.uk with unjustified reviews, and when @sweepyface (Brenda Leyland) was linked to one of those negative reviews the way was clear. She, one of the more moderate dissenters, was to be the first EXAMPLE to be outed and presented to the world as a troll, soon to be followed by those that actually used veiled threats against the parents. Her "crime" was that she had written a review on Amazon and lived in Leicester.

Only that the whole campaign to finally shut up those questioning the McCanns failed not only to coincide with Scotland Yard giving up the case as impossible to solve, but also because the first victim of the campaign dared to kill herself. (Pending coroner's verdict)

And so Gerry now refuses to talk about "trolls"

Asked whether they felt it was right for the media to identify internet trolls, 46-year-old Mr McCann replied: ‘I don't really want to talk about trolls, we're here very much to talk about child rescue.’

Of course he is... And enjoying himself on a charity do, where he was sure to run into Hugh Grant and was able to discuss the advantages of sending in the Press when need be.All in the spirit of the #HackedOff campaign.

For those of you who really want to get to the bottom of the news and want to decide for themselves if Brenda Leyland did anything that constituted an offence (either by racism or threats) , feel free to check yourself in her "tweet-file".

.

And Gerry said:"Let there be an example.."

....and there was an example

Rest in Peace sweepyface and rest assured that the intimidation campaign against those that dare to question the McCanns will not be successful.

Your "crime" was a tweet that called for the McCanns to suffer "for the rest of their miserable lives "
The same "crime" Kate McCann committed in her book when talking about Goncalo Amaral, saying "he deserves to be miserable and feel fear".

Don't judge a book by it's cover

No, I am not going to dwell again on the impossibility of the "last photo" being taken on Thursday 3rd of May. I am not going to mention the difficulty of losing ones hard earned tan within hours or gaining the same on a rainy day. Not on the tantrums little girls can throw when they are not going to get to wear their new dresses until the 6th day of their holiday or the meteorological facts in the western Algarve in May 2007.

Instead I am going to start with those things that are NOT in the book. A book with the claim of being the "most definite account possible" should cover all aspects of the case. One would think....

The first thing you notice missing is the word "NEGLECT". It appears only once in connection with a person who had the audacity to ask that the parents be investigated by Leicestershire police for child neglect. Something that would be normal had Maddie gone missing in the UK. Nine adults, leaving eight children, aged from 1-3, on five consecutive nights alone in apartments outside a confined resort without proper supervision, with at least one child crying on one night for at least 75 minutes (1 hour and 15 minutes) should be challenged by investigative authors about their parental conscience. At least once.

The next thing that is missing is everything surrounding the person of David Payne that might in any way be deemed libelous although it is part of the police files the summerswaning couple are so eager to cite, albeit, I fear, from translations they appear to use from unpaid authors firmly placed in the nutter box by the almost-Pulitzer-Winners... still unpaid, but used...

Neither the statements by Mr. and Mrs. Gaspar about an alleged incident in Mallorca on a previous holiday is mentioned, nor the alleged recognition of David Payne by Yvonne Martin, nor is the incident properly described where David Payne visits Kate McCann in/out of the apartment on May 3rd at 17:00/17:30/19:00 with/without his wife and with/without Gerry being present. Would the vision of Kate wrapped in a towel after her shower have distracted Anthony, the old rascal?

Also prominently missing is every statement from the police files that contradicts the version of the parents. Like the statement by the cleaner of the Ocean Club who was very certain that one of the cots had been placed in the parent's bedroom and NOT in the children's bedroom as the authors/parents claimed. Nor the statement of the Ocean Club receptionist who claims the reservation for the Tapas Bar was made by a man who was accompanied by a child that she thought had been Madeleine.


Missing is also the clear fact that after prolonged discussions there are emails in the files by all friends of the McCanns clearly rejecting the participation in the proposed reconstruction. The authors simply claim that the Public Prosecutor had given up on the notion of a reconstruction without mentioning their clear refusal.

And it goes on. The many inconsistencies in their statements like the point of entry/exit, the curtains, how they left Madeleine, who she claimed had cried the night of Wednesday - all brushed away with one declaration that everybody that has to deal with statements including the acclaimed authors KNOWS that statements are notoriously fallible. Oh well, that revelation will revolutionise the judicial system.

But what I found even worse than the many omissions that would be necessary to give an unbiased and independent account of the disappearance of a little girl are the slight twists of the evidence at hand. Deliberate little "amendmends to the truth" that might fool those that haven't spent months of real research of the files.

An example regarding the search Eddie the cadaver dog did on the items taken from the villa of the parents:

"When these items were taken to another location for examination, the dog Eddie alerted to clothing in one of the boxes. Again, Grime thought it possible that the cadaver dog was reacting to cadaver scent contamination."

Eddie did not react to the clothing IN "one of the boxes ". He reacted to Kate's white top and checkered trousers and one t-shirt of Madeleine that had been laid out on the floor together with the rest of the contents of that box. By saying he reacted to clothing IN the box and not to clothing FROM the box it is insinuated that this scent might have resulted from some sort of transferance, which could not have been the case since it was only three explicit items from the box he reacted to. Had transference been the cause every item would have rendered an alert.

Another example of twisting the evidence comes from the description of the already mentioned visit by David Payne in 5A:

"David, who had stopped by the McCanns' apartment earlier, said as he sat down that Madeleine and the twins had "looked like perfect children ... all clean in their pyjamas, having a story""

Now this quote does not come from any statement by David Payne but rather from the statement by Fiona Payne, his wife. His comment had run like this:

The three children were all you know dressed you know in their pyjamas, you know they looked immaculate, you know they were just like angels, they all looked so happy and well looked after and content and I said to Kate, you know it's a bit early for the you know, for the three of them to be going to bed, she said ah they've had such a great time, they're really tired and you know err so I say, you know I can't remember exactly what, what you know the night attire, what the children were wearing but white was the predominant err colour

Why was David's recollection not allowed to enter the most definite account possible? Why had Fiona's statement to be used? One explanation could be the mention of the colour white in the pyjamas which was the colour Aoife Smith remembered instead of the predominantly pink with floral aspects that was presented to the world.

One last example is at least questionable regarding its origin. With the sighting by George Brooks of a couple carrying a child on the early morning of May 4th we don't see any evidence that the authors have actually spoken to George. They refer more than once to the files and not to a personal interview with him. Nevertheless we find an exact description of the said couple whereby the man has a remarkable similarity whith the man Jane Tanner allegedly saw the night before thought to be the abductor for almost 7 years:

 "...Brooks said, he thought the couple were both in their thirties. The man was "less than 6 foot tall", had "shoulder-length hair and looked quite tanned". The woman was "dark-haired and slim". To him, they did not look British, or like tourists."

This description is nowhere to be found in the files. It is simply copied and pasted from a Daily Express article from May 7th as if it was gospel truth...

I could go on dissecting the most definite account possible but since it's world-wide distribution looks to be only marginal, it would be time wasted. The notion is clear. The almost sickening repetition of the mantra that there is not a shred of evidence against the parents had to brush over the fact that indeed there are plenty of indications and possible circumstantial evidence that at least raise legitimate doubt.

Roflmao

A Sauce said - New Blogpost

A subtle hint by the media?

McCanns' FURY at Maddie slur -  Sun 01.09.2007  Parents' FURY as Portuguese Press Claims they...30-08-07 Maddie's Uncle In Fund FURY 2.12.07 FURY at Bremner's McCann Sketch. The Guardian 16-10-07 FURY at Rory Bremner's TV Sketch about Missing...16-10-07 Madeleine: New Police Chief's FURY over the Mess..22-10-07 Kate McCann's FURY at Police Offer of a 'Deal' 19-11-07 Portuguese Police's FURY as British DNA Experts....05-12-07 Madeleine: Gerry's FURY at 'Bungling' Dog Handlers 17-12-07 Madeleine McCann Police FURY Over Private Hunt 25-09-07 McCann Family & Friends Vent Their FURY. Times 07-09-07 McCanns' Note FURY. Daily Mirror 15-06-07 McCanns' FURY at Police Chief's Warning 04-01-08 McCann FURY at 'Maddie' For Hire. The Sun 11-01-08 McCann's FURY at Police Leak 11-04-08 FURY at McCann 'Crucifixion'. The Sun 19-02-08 Border FURY of Maddie's Parents. The Sun 03-12-07 FURY at New Maddie Theory. The Sun 23-08-07 Statement FURY of the 'Tapas 7'. The Sun 08-11-07 Readers in FURY at Sick Stunt. The Sun 12-01-08 FURY at Maddie 'Ghost Chat'. The Sun 29-12-08 Kate's FURY at Detective Who Published Book On.....06-09-08 FURY Over Madeleine Crying 'Smear'. Sky 11-04-08 Family FURY Over 'Madeleine is Dead' Interview. Sky 12-08-07 McCann Mortgage Fund FURY. Daily Mirror 30-10-07 FURY as McCanns Accused Of Burying Body. Sky 01-10-07 Tory's FURY At McCann's Leak. Belfast Telegraph 13-04-08 Madeleine McCann Suspect's FURY At Finding GPS......17-03-08 FURY at new Madeleine book 'slur' 25.9.09 Maddie Dad's FURY At Cop's Banned Book. The Sun 10-09-09 McCanns' FURY At Death Claim. Daily Express 14-01-10 FURY Over Kate & Gerry McCann Using Photograph.....19-02-08 Police FURY At Madeleine McCann Parents 29-01-08 McCanns FURY At TV Girl. Daily Mirror 24-08-07 McCanns' Overdose Smear FURY. Daily Mirror 25-08-07 FURY Over Maddy's Lookalike. Daily Mirror 11-01-08 FURY Over Book On The McCanns By Disgraced Police...25-07-08 Gerry & Kate McCann's FURY After 14 Texts Slur 29-05-08 FURY As Madeleine Cop Brings Sick Book To UK 17-08-08 McCanns FURY Over 'Neglect'. The People 26-10-08 FURY over Spoof Chat To Maddie. The People 28-12-08 Kate McCann's FURY At New Madeleine Smears 11-04-08 FURY At Maddie Joke As Gerry Returns To Work 01-11-07 FURY Of Maddie Probe Pervert's Family. Daily Star 23-05-09 FURY Mounts Over Slurs on Madeleine McCann’s.... 21-03-08 McCanns’ FURY at media slurs. Liverpool Echo 24-08-07 FURY as Vulcan attacks. Daily Mirror 12-09-07 Maddie's Uncle In Fund FURY. Sunday Mail 02-12-07 Maddie's aunt FURY at diary move. Evening Times 13-09-07 McCanns FURY at 'media slurs'. Evening Times 24-08-07 McCanns' FURY at policeman claims. Evening Times 10-09-09 McCanns’ FURY at book ruling. Sunday Express 24-10-10 Maddy dad's cops FURY. Daily Mirror 13-08-07 Maddy parents' FURY at murder suspects claim 09-08-07 FURY as Madeleine McCann images used in porn art...23-01-09 Kate tells Portugal of FURY at cop hunt. The Sun 23-05-11 FURY at claims by tecs. Sunday Mirror 16-12-07 McCann web FURY. The News of the World 20-09-09 McCanns FURY over Wiki slur. News of the World 19-12-10 Maddie Mum Orgy FURY. Daily Star 05-11-07   Exclusive: Cop FURY as drug Brit flees. The Sun 17-12-07 Maddie's dad FURY at TV girl. Daily Star 14-01-10 Maddie stunt FURY. Hackney Gazette 22-01-09 New Team FURY Over Files Mess. Sunday Mirror 21-10-07 Maddy Slurs FURY. Daily Mirror 01-10-07 McCanns' FURY at TV Freeze. Sunday Mirror 02-12-07 FURY Over Writer's Joke Interview With Madeleine... 29-12-08 McCanns' FURY as Ulster Cop Quits. Daily Mirror 06-10-10 FURY as Frankie Boyle cracks 'joke' at expense of...10-01-12 FURY over top job for Tory activist who dressed up..01-02-12 FURY as Madeleine’s photograph promotes discount...11-05-12 Kate's FURY. Daily Record 22-07-08 McCanns' FURY At Sick Maddie Adverts. Daily Record 01-11-07 FURY of Hacking Victims. Daily Express 30-11-12 McCanns' FURY Over Kidnap Film. Daily Star 15-07-13 FURY at Roma Gypsies. Private Eye 91-11-13 'We just want justice' FURY of Madeleine McCann....16-06-14 McCann FURY at Slur Cop. The Sun 17-06-14 McCanns' FURY at disgraced cop's vile claims 17-06-14

A message from Goncalo Amaral

21 Jul 2014

Dear friends,

Upon reading the news about the most recent trial session, I am certain that the vast majority of journalists doesn’t know what is being discussed in court, and have not informed correctly.
.............................
Continue here




-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lisbon Appellate Court’s decision - 2010

The book at stake in this process – "Maddie – the Truth of the Lie" – which was written by the defendant Dr. Gonçalo Amaral, has the main motivation of defending his personal and professional honour, as the author points out right away in the preface and throughout his text.

The contents of the book does not offend any of the applicants' fundamental rights.

The exercise of its writing and publication is included in the constitutional rights that are secured to everyone by the European Convention on Human Rights and by the Portuguese Republic’s Constitution, namely in its articles 37º and 38º.

In support of the People of Praia da Luz

As pessoas na Praia da Luz dizem: #SomosTodosPedintes
Pedimos Paz!

 
People in Praia da Luz say: #WeAreAllBeggars
We ask for Peace!

Die Menschen in Praia da Luz sagen: #WirSindAlleBettler
Wir wollen Frieden!

Going through the motions

My take on the Arguidos and the alleged evidence based on the report by Marisa Rodrigues from JN to which I would like to express a very special thanks for a professional reporting. 



1. S.M.

1.1. The sofa

The alleged similarity between hairs found on the discarded sofa and in Apartment 5A is only theoretical. Since no DNA had been obtained in 2007 from S.M. the only comparison that could be done in the Lisbon lab was to extract and analyse the MtDNA from the hairs and place them in the relevant Haplotype groups.

Haplotype X - apart. Ocean Club e sofa of 1-seat in the garage in Portimao
Haplotype Y - apart. Ocean Club e sofa of 1-seat in the garage in Portimao
Haplotype Z - Residencia Liliana e sofa of 1-seat in the garage in Portimao

But since there are only a certain number of haplotypes it is of absolute no relevance if the same haplotype is found in two different spots.

There was also a similarity of hairs in a completely unrelated apartment in Burgau and Apartment 5A. And if my hair was tested I am sure my haplotype would fit one of the hairs found in 5A as well.

1.2. The hearsay

The statement concerning the alleged overheard conversation regarding a body that had to be disposed of was neither made to the PJ nor is it part of the original rogatory process and can therefore only have been made to one of the McCann's private investigators. How much credibility does this have if it was the then suspects PI's that "unearthed" this statement? The credibility of Metodo 3 (and I suspect it was them) has been at it's height when they promised Maddie to be back by Christmas and has since lost considerably...

1.3. The arson

This was a crime directed at the Arguido, the burning of his car and the framing of him. Wouldn't it be a good idea to try and find out who did it and why, instead of turning the victim of a crime into a suspect of another crime because he had been a victim in the first place?
Do we have to point out that this crime was committed during the reign of Metodo 3?

2. J.S. ("recently diagnosed with a brain tumour. He didn't follow his doctor and his lawyer advice and decided to speak up to refute the accusations.")

2.1 The burglarizer

In the list of employees of the Ocean Club there is the word "furto" attached to the Arguido's name, written by the PJ investigation which means "theft". But so it is with 2 other persons that are not being targeted by Scotland Yard. Of course it is normal that people that have been charged previously with some kind of offence should be investigated, but this had obviously been done by the PJ who came up with no connection. We should not forget that NOTHING was taken from 5A exept the body of a little girl.

2.2 The phonecalls

The only phonecall relating to J.S. in the released PJ files is to the number allegedly belonging to R.R. at 21:51. Nothing else.

2.4. The residence

J.S. lives on Rua Primero do Maio. The Smith sighting was in Rua 25 de Abril roughly 350 metre away, in no way a suspicious distance in such a small town if you live in the centre and not in some ex-pat area.

2.5. The e-fit

The person who allegedly helped to draw up this e-fit was 60-80% convinced that it had been Gerry McCann who he had seen. The fact that the e-fit had been hidden by the McCanns for years and the sighting covered-up weighs heavy against the possible similarity of somebody's face to an e-fit done by private investigators of the then suspects.

3. P.R.

Acting strangely might be excused when you are suffering from schizophrenia. Apart from that we have the same MO of the then accused's PI's contacting witnesses and getting e-fits done. Not in any way an independent source. Phonecalls are not in the files

4. R.R.

Having been only 16 years at the time of the "disappearance" he is supposed to fit the description of a witness who described a man 18-20 years of age as being a charity collector, which in itself is not a crime, at least not outside the Metodo world.

This and the one phonecall that can be found in the files should be sufficient to drag this young man in front of the vicious british media? I think not.

The whole "request" is in my opinion copied straight from a report of Metodo 3 that Scotland Yard found in the boxes they collected from their offices during a raid in Barcelona some years ago.

Which leaves a couple of questions: Why was it approved by the Portuguese judiciary? And what was the purpose of this action? To prepare for shelving the case again, because no patsy will ever be found after this latest farce? Or to refute even the most ludicrous scenarios that entered the process when they were found inside the boxes of Metodo 3 and therefore have to be dealt with?